1 Gardazahn

Argumentative Essay Of Euthanasia

How to write a euthanasia argumentative essay?

The task to write an argumentative essay is to put in use the reasoning skills gathered by the students over the years of learning. The main idea is to tell the reader why your reasoning is true and provide evidence to support the same. The issues surrounding euthanasia are many with broad ideas. It is therefore, important to research and outline a proper thesis in the beginning and exhaust a single topic with counter arguments.

Researching the topic

The first step in writing a euthanasia argumentative essay is to research the topic. There are many sources online that would give adequate account of the topic at hand. The sources need to be scholarly and very relevant to the counter argument you intend to use. This will get you familiar with the topic.

The following are the most recent arguments that  have developed about euthanasia:

  • Is euthanasia legal?
  • Do people have the right to proclaim that the suffering is too much and should therefore be set free from the suffering?
  • What are the reasonable approaches that could be used to assist medical practitioners on the challenges of euthanasia?
  • Is active euthanasia enough to be considered as murder?
  • Why has voluntary active euthanasia been a challenging issue in the United States?
  • Outline the arguments that have been forwarded over the years for or against euthanasia with strong arguments to support your claims.
  • What is the is the possible future of euthanasia in our country.
  • What are the reasons for criminalization of euthanasia in our country.

Then write an outline that identifies the main point that you intend to use in the paper. Focus on developing every part of the outline and the important points should not be left out. Having a clear outline will ease the part of writing the body for the essay. It will direct the logical thoughts and ensure that you do not leave out anything important to your essay. The structure of the outline will determine whether the argumentative essay will be objective and a success.

Writing the Thesis Statement for the essay

The thesis statement of every essay is a summary of the main points of the essay. It should be clear and precise to tell the reader what the essay is about. The thesis appears in the first paragraph of the essay. The first paragraph introduces the topic and explains its importance.  Before  writing the thesis, give a slight background of the topic to ensure that the reader will easily understand your thesis. The thesis statement should be focused on the topic and appear at the last sentence of the introduction paragraph.

Example of Euthanasia thesis could be ‘ Taking life with or without the consent of the owner is murder.’

Developing body paragraphs of a euthanasia argumentative essay

Each body paragraph should be focused in addressing a key issue and assist in developing the argument of the thesis. Better yet, you can decide to dedicate each research source to its own paragraph. Here is where a proper outline comes in handy. Give your arguments accompanied with solid evidence to support each claim.

You might include a single paragraph with a philosopher’s argument that does not agree with your own. Give evidence of this opinion with the source cited. In this paragraph ensure to outline why you think the argument is weak and out of topic respectfully. Considering the ideas of an opposing argument is a good way to strengthen your own and it is widely viewed to be polite. The conclusion paragraph should give a summary of the reasons outlined in the body. End the essay with a repeat of the thesis statement in the conclusion paragraph.

Once you are done with the essay, it is time to proofread and ensure that the essay has taken an argumentative format. Check that the ideas are connected logically and the arguments are well organized. Look out for areas that you may add some contractions and that the essay does not follow a casual tone and style.

Ask a question

Introduction
Euthanasia is the practice of deliberately killing a person to spare him or her from having to deal with more pain and suffering. This is always a controversial issue because of the moral and ethical components that are involved. This paper will discuss the arguments against euthanasia.

Discussion
Euthanasia is clearly against the Hippocratic Oath that all doctors have to fulfil. This oath basically states that doctors must never be involved in the killing of people because after all, they have been trained to ensure that people are able to recover from their diseases and injuries. Doctors are the ones whom people entrust their lives whenever there is something wrong with their health. Thus, it is the responsibility of the doctors to always do the best they can to help people live and enjoy their lives (Cavan 48). If their patients die under their supervision, the doctors can accept this for as long as they know and can prove that they really did their best and exhausted all possibilities to ensure the survival of the patients. There are just certain instances where the disease or the injury of the patients has become so serious that it is already difficult to treat and make the patients recover. In these cases, it is unfair to blame the doctors for the death of the patients. The Hippocratic Oath helps the doctors to realize how important their responsibilities are to the people in terms of their health. This oath also provides an assurance to the people that they can trust their doctors and be assured that they will do whatever is necessary to help them deal with their health problems. If euthanasia becomes legalized, then the effectiveness of the Hippocratic Oath will be negated and the doctors can have the option of immediately resorting to euthanasia especially in difficult cases instead of trying their best until the very end.

Another argument against euthanasia is that it is essentially homicide
because the doctors will kill the patient even if it has been approved by the patient himself or the family of the patient. Euthanasia is not that different from murder because they both involve killing a person. The only difference is that in euthanasia, there is mercy and consent involved while in murder there is none (Tulloch 82). If murder is prohibited by law because people take matters into their own hands and kill others, then euthanasia should also be banned because doctors take matters into their own hands and kill their patients even if there is consent from the patients and their families or relatives.

Lastly, the continued improvements and innovations in the field of medicine and health care make euthanasia illogical to be implemented as an option. The reason why medical experts continue to work hard to come up with improved medical technologies, medicines and treatment methods is that they want to make sure that the sick people are able to recover faster and healthy people become even healthier. All of these efforts are being done to make the society become more productive due to the presence of healthy and strong people (McDougall 26). Thus, doctors will not have an excuse for not doing their best for their patients as they already have access to the best medical technologies, medicines and treatment methods that will prevent them from having to resort to euthanasia as the only option.

Conclusion
There is no doubt that euthanasia needs to be banned as based on the three arguments discussed above, it does not deserve a place in human society. Doctors must never give up on their patients no matter how hopeless the situation might be. They must exhaust all options to give their patients a fighting chance to survive and

Leave a Comment

(0 Comments)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *