Essay On Human Nature Good Or Evil
Human Nature: Good or Evil?
- Language Arts
- Current Events
Brief DescriptionStage a debate or write an essay in response to the question Is human nature inherently good or inherently evil?
- engage in informal group discussions, pose questions and debate answers, think critically, and contribute their own information and ideas.
- define good and evil.
- support, in writing, their contention that human nature is good or evil.
Keywordshuman nature, good, evil, philosophy, debate, essay, persuasive
- copy of the Kids Philosophy Slam Debate contest rules
- overhead projector
- paper and word processor
- newspaper or magazine articles that express human nature as good
- newspaper or magazine articles that express human nature as evil
Day One: Introduction to Philosophy
Begin the lesson by introducing the Kids Philosophy Slam Debate contest rules. Project the rules and information on an overhead, read them aloud, or provide each student with a copy.
Next, write the word philosophy on the chalkboard. Discuss the meaning of the word and its Greek origins:
- philo = lover
- Sophia = goddess of wisdom
- philosopher = one who loves wisdom, one who pursues wisdom
Distribute dictionaries. Have students look up the words human, nature, good, and evil in the dictionary, and then write the words and definitions in their notebooks. Discuss whether or not human nature (the core or essence of humanity) is good or evil. Clarify the difference between nature and action; explain that the former is our being, the latter is our choice.
Day Two: Human Nature as Good
Using personal examples and articles from newspapers and magazines, lead a direct lesson on human nature as good. This lesson should be as convincing as possible, and deliberately biased. Students can take notes as their peers provide support for the argument that human nature is, by nature, pure, good, and undefiled. Society corrupts human nature; life's hardships and limitations may make human nature seem evil, but it is important to stress in todays lesson that at their core, human beings are good. After making the case, open the floor to students who want to provide information that will support the contention that humans are naturally good. Again, this lesson should be deliberately biased. For homework, assign students to find newspaper and magazine articles that support the contention that humans are good by nature.
Day Three: Human Nature as Evil
"So, human nature is evil, right?" Begin todays lesson with that question. (Students will be amazed or groan at your sudden turnaround -- since just yesterday you convinced them that the opposite was true!) This lesson will challenge students to think critically. Encourage them to cite events that seem to indicate that humans are innately evil. Lead the lessons with a focus on how laws, family, and religion keep human nature in check; without those devices human beings would revert to their true nature, which is evil. Let students join in with any thoughts, questions, reflections, insights, and comments that support the argument that humans are evil by nature. For homework, encourage students to find examples demonstrating that human nature is evil.
Day Four: Student Discussion
Arrange students into small discussion groups of four or five students. Challenge them to think critically as they engage in discussions about human nature as good or evil. Ask them to consider the following: Do they experience more evil or good in people? Is that evil or good a true representation of human nature? What do their own experiences support? Then, have students analyze one another's positions, break down the question, and begin to discriminate. Each student should take notes on a T-chart with the headings good and evil at the top of the page. As group discussions ensue, have students write ideas and facts that support each point of view under the appropriate heading.
Day Five: Taking Sides
Students work in small groups again. Now the note taking and debating is over and they must choose one side or the other (good or evil). Circulate throughout the room to be sure discussions focus on the nature of human character, not on the actions of particular humans. Students will have a lot to say!
At the end of the group discussions, have each student write a brief proposal of his or her position, listing at least three personal reasons (personal experiences) to justify that position. Students will turn in those papers at the end of the period.
Days Six-Ten: Writing Essays
Students begin writing an essay of 500 words or less. They should start with a thesis ( human nature as good or evil), and include in the body of the essay personal examples that support that idea. During this week, students write, edit (self and peer), and revise their papers until they are ready to hand in. Do a quick final edit to ensure that the format has been followed.
When all essays are collected, students might compare them to some of The Kids Philosophy Slam Winners on this topic.
Lesson Plan Source
The philsophyslam.org contest inspired this lesson.
Assessment will take be based on group discussions, a written proposal of each students position with personal examples to support it, and a final 500-word essay that clearly supports via personal examples whether human nature is good or evil.
Patricia Rose Pflaumer, Abington (Massachusetts) High School
Originally published 01/23/2003
Last updated 05/19/2008
Submit a Lesson Plan
To help us keep our Lesson Plan Database as current as possible, please e-mail us to report any links that are not working.
Human Nature: Good or Evil? Essay
1060 WordsFeb 23rd, 20085 Pages
For centuries many philosophers, as well as most individuals, have pondered on the question what is good and what is evil. More-so philosophers of all ages have also stumbled upon a more in depth question which is if the intuitive knowledge of man's nature is good, or if it is evil. Many have claimed to have an answer to these puzzling questions yet most of their answers were found to be incomplete and inadequate at a later date. Religion also tried to provide a solution but to my understanding only caused more of an entanglement if anything. According to the current definition from Webster, good is defined as morally excellent; virtuous; righteous; pious; where as evil is defined as morally wrong or bad; immoral; wicked. One could…show more content…
Would these people be considered evil and if so how did they become this way? Were they born this was or was it some sort of external forces that led them to become evil? Well according to Hsun Tao, another Chinese philosopher, humans were born of an evil nature and with some sort of guidance from a teacher could learn to become good. He believed that what is natural to human beings is desire and desire inevitably leads to conflict; since this is evil then so is the nature the results within. Yet referring back to the young child and well example, why would most people do the right thing? Is it because they are taught to be good again is it something that is deeper? However, another Chinese philosopher, Kao Tzu, beleived that human nature is neither inherently good nor inherently evil but rather a "blank slate" that could be conditioned in both directions. When an individual is born he/she has no ideas or preexisting behaviors but that through life experiences and external forces, such as family and friends, that influence ones human nature. Or according to John Locke "the mind at birth is a blank white sheet of paper on which experience writes." Religion also claims to provide a solution for whether human nature is initially good or evil but this of course varies upon the religion. According to Catholicism everyone who has been born is tainted with original sin which according to the bible is an inclination to evil caused