1 JoJoshakar

Freedom Isnt Free Essays About Technology

Government is not made in virtue of natural rights, which may and do exist in total independence of it—and exist in much greater clearness, and in a much greater degree of abstract perfection—but their abstract perfection is their practical defect. By having a right to everything, they want everything. Government is a contrivance of human wisdom to provide for human wants.

Men have a right that these wants should be provided for by this wisdom. Among these wants is to be reckoned the want, out of civil society, of a sufficient restraint upon their passions. Society requires not only that the passions of individuals should be subjected, but that even in the mass and body as well as in the individuals, the inclinations of men should frequently be thwarted, their will controlled, and their passions brought into subjection. This can only be done by a power out of themselves, and not, in the exercise of its function, subject to that will and to those passions which it is its office to bridle and subdue. In this sense the restraints on men as well as their liberties are to be reckoned among their rights. But as the liberties and the restrictions vary with times and circumstances, and admit of infinite modifications, they cannot be settled upon any abstract rule, and nothing is so foolish as to discuss them upon that principle.

The moment you abate anything from the full rights of men, each to govern himself and suffer any artificial positive limitation upon those rights, from that moment the whole organization of government becomes a consideration of convenience. This it is which makes the constitution of a state and the due distribution of its powers a matter of the most delicate and complicated skill. It requires a deep knowledge of human nature and human necessities and of the things which facilitate or obstruct the various ends which are to be pursued by the mechanism of civil institutions. The state is to have recruits to its strength and remedies to its distempers. What is the use of discussing a man’s abstract right to food or to medicine? The question is upon the method of procuring and administering them. In that deliberation I shall always advise to call in the aid of the farmer and the physician, rather than the professor of metaphysics.

The science of constructing a commonwealth, or renovating it, or reforming it, is, like every other experimental science, not to be taught a priori. Nor is it a short experience that can instruct us in that practical science, because the real effects of moral causes are not always immediate; that which in the first instance is prejudicial may be excellent in its remoter operation, and its excellence may arise even from the ill effects it produces in the beginning. The reverse also happens, and very plausible schemes with very pleasing commencements have often shameful and lamentable conclusions. In states there are often some obscure and almost latent causes, things which appear at first view of little moment, on which a very great part of its prosperity or adversity may most essentially depend. The science of government being therefore so practical in itself, and intended for such practical purposes, a matter which requires experience, and even more experience than any person can gain in his whole life, however sagacious and observing he may be, it is with infinite caution that any man ought to venture upon pulling down an edifice which has answered in any tolerable degree for ages the common purposes of society, or on building it up again, without having models and patterns of approved utility before his eyes.

These metaphysic rights entering into common life, like rays of light which pierce into a dense medium, are, by the laws of nature, refracted from their straight line. Indeed in the gross and complicated mass of human passions and concerns, the primitive rights of men undergo such a variety of refractions and reflections that it becomes absurd to talk of them as if they continued in the simplicity of their original direction. The nature of man is intricate; the objects of society are of the greatest possible complexity, and therefore no simple disposition or direction of power can be suitable either to man’s nature or to the quality of his affairs. When I hear the simplicity of contrivance aimed at and boasted of in any new political constitutions, I am at no loss to decide that the artificers are grossly ignorant of their trade, or totally negligent of their duty. The simple governments are fundamentally defective, to say no worse of them. If you were to contemplate society in but one point of view, all these simple modes of polity are infinitely captivating. In effect each would answer its single end much more perfectly than the more complex is able to attain all its complex purposes. But it is better that the whole should be imperfectly and anomalously answered, than that, while some parts are provided for with great exactness, others might be totally neglected, or perhaps materially injured, by the overcare of a favorite member.

The pretended rights of these theorists are all extremes, and in proportion as they are metaphysically true, they are morally and politically false.The rights of men are in a sort of middle, incapable of definition, but not impossible to be discerned. The rights of men in governments are their advantages, and these are often in balances between differences of good; in compromises sometimes between good and evil, and sometimes between evil and evil. Political reason is a computing principle; adding, subtracting, multiplying, and dividing, morally and not metaphysically or mathematically, true moral denominations.

By these theorists the right of the people is almost always sophistically confounded with their power. The body of the community, whenever it can come to act, can meet with no effectual resistance, but till power and right are the same, the whole body of them has no right inconsistent with virtue, and the first of all virtues, prudence. Men have no right to what is not reasonable, and to what is not for their benefit.

From Reflections on the Revolution in France. Burke was appalled by the events in France, writing Reflections to quell his countrymen’s support for what he referred to as a “monstrous tragicomic scene.” Thomas Paine condemned him for his “flagrant misrepresentations,” declaring, “From the part Mr. Burke took in the American Revolution, it was natural that I should consider him a friend to mankind; and as our acquaintance commenced on that ground, it would have been more agreeable to me to have had cause to continue in that opinion, than to change it.”

Back to Issue

Shop Now

  • Nelson Mandela's Fight for Freedom
  • Freedom of the Will and the Concept of the Person
  • Elimination of the Fourth Ammendment: Freedom and Privacy
  • Freedom Fighters of India
  • Role of Press in Indian Freedom Struggle
  • Freedom of the Press Versus Right to Privacy
  • The Ultimate Weight Solution: The Seven Keys to Weightloss Freedom by Dr. Phil
  • Freedom in Mark Twain's The Adventures of Tom Sawyer
  • The Freedom to the Choice of Abortion
  • The United States and the Ideals of Freedom
  • Illustrating Freedom and Responsibility as an Opposing Dichotomy in Kate Chopin's "The Awakening"
  • Compare Theodore Roosevelt's 'Square Deal' with Woodrow Wilson's 'New Freedom.' Who was more of a progressive?
  • The Taliban: Afghanistan´s Freedom Fighters
  • The Difference in Thoughts on Freedom of the Grand Inquisitor and Existentialists
  • Freedom Writers Analysis Paper
  • The United States Military Protects Our Freedom: More Men and Women Volunteers Are Need for the Military.
  • Freedom Writers by Erin Gruwell
  • The Great Concept of American Freedom
  • Exploring the Idea of Freedom of Speech in American Media
  • Search For Freedom in The Yellow Wallpaper
  • Freedom vs. Gun Control
  • Religious Freedom in the Workplace
  • Georgina’s Struggle for Freedom in The Cook, the Thief, his Wife and her Lover
  • Jean-Paul Sartre’s Philosophy: Radical Freedom and Responsibility
  • March to Freedom: Edith Singer
  • Separation of Church and State is Necessary for Freedom of Choice
  • The American Revolution And Women's Freedom
  • A Separation of Church and State Ensures our Individual Freedoms
  • Iran Provides No Freedom of Speech on the Internet
  • Your Freedom Is Not Free
  • Freedom Of Expression - Our First Amendment Rights Are Threatened
  • Internet Censorship Means No Freedom of Speech
  • Freedom in Dostoevsky's Notes from Underground
  • Freedom Of Expression
  • From Bondage to Freedom
  • Choosing Freedom over Equality
  • Internet Censorship: Censoring Freedom
  • Is Falling Failure or Freedom?
  • The Statue of Liberty Lending Credence to the Word Freedom in America
  • My Bondage and my Freedom
  • Artificial Wombs Will Spawn New Freedoms
  • The March to Real Freedom
  • The Theme of Freedom in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
  • Freedom Under Hospitable Captivity
  • Testamentary Freedom and Validity of Wills
  • The US Constitution as an Inspiration to the Declaration of Freedom in Kosovo
  • Long Walk to Freedom by Nelson Mandela– Book Review
  • Essay on Freedom and Satan in John Milton’s Paradise Lost
  • The Doukhobors, Sons of Freedom and the Canadian Government
  • The Appropriate Use of Freedom of Speech
  • Freedom iin Kate Chopin's The Awakening
  • Regulating Food Advertising and Freedom of Speech
  • Freedom of Religion: THe Maryland Toleration Act
  • Rights and Freedoms of Aboriginals
  • Ensuring Freedom
  • Film Review - Freedom Writers
  • Rights, Duties and Freedoms
  • Mandating Seat Belt Usage vs. Freedom of Choice
  • Abortion: A Freedom of Choice
  • Limitations that Freedom of Speech Should Have
  • Sarty Snopes’ Struggle for Freedom: William Faulkner's Barn Burning
  • Helping the Poor Whites in the Book, American Slavery, American Freedom by Edmund S. Morgan
  • Operation Iraqi Freedom
  • Voices of Freedom Chapter 1-4
  • Freedom and Morality in Kant's Ethics
  • Freedom in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain
  • Leadership: Equality, Justice, Truth, and Freedom
  • Freedom for Rousseau and Individual Liberties
  • Brave New World and Individual Freedom
  • Freedom of Self- Expression: Tattoos and Body Piercings at 16 Should be Permitted
  • Between Our Freedom is a Bloody Nose
  • Obedience: The Odyssey to Freedom
  • Martin Luther King's Speech in Jobs and Freedom
  • Saint Augustine: His concept of Freedom
  • Balancing Individual Privacy with Press Freedom
  • Formula for Freedom
  • Freedom of Speech: The Engel Vs Vitale Case
  • The Struggle for Freedom in Yellow Wallpaper and Story of an Hour
  • True Freedom in Lawrence's Aaron’s Rod
  • The Freedom of the Forest in The Scarlet Letter
  • The Drawbacks of Freedom
  • Persepolis: Captivity V. Freedom
  • John Locke and John Stuart Mill's Definition of Freedom
  • Lack of Freedom Of Speech in Sudan
  • Freedom Writers: Rhetorical Analysis Essay
  • American Freedom - No Greater Gift
  • No Freedom for Women in Ancient Rome

Leave a Comment

(0 Comments)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *